The current research examined the sensed impact of parental and social force on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great interest were: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) just how do the individuals feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) How do the individuals predict they will react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this study. The findings suggest that almost all the individuals had been affected by the social stress placed upon them. More over, the individuals sensed the generation that is previous “racist”. Nevertheless, interestingly you can find signs of a generational mindset change. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent regarding the participants failed to desire to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The residual 20 per cent had been against interfaith and cross-cultural dating and marriages.
This can be a preview of membership content, access via your organization.
Purchase article that is single
Immediate access to your full article PDF.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
Contribute to journal
Immediate on line access to any or all presssing dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.
It must be noted that relationship is generally speaking perhaps perhaps maybe not acceptable within the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention will be date solely (nonetheless, particular limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) along with the make an effort to get hitched. More over, in some instances, the approval regarding the female’s daddy ( or other significant male figure) is had a need to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter had been addressed through the number of the info in purchase to respect participants’ social traditions and observing that is religious.
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial relationship: Uncertainty, understanding, as well as the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social therapy (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.
Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.
Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a test that is longitudinal of contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.
Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin males dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227 december.
Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using analysis that is thematic therapy. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.
Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous types of tradition. United states Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex in addition to context that is cultural of and closeness. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.
Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and intimate love: the Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.
Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Communication Yearbook, 10, 283–322.
Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t sleep around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and sex in Filipina American everyday lives. Indication, 26, 415–440.
Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.
Felmlee, D. (2003). Relationship in social support systems. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). New York: Plenum.
Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate lovers’ perceptions of social networking features because of the passage through of some time relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.
Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Cultural factors within the choice of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.
Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Factors, patterns, styles. Yearly Report About Sociology, 395–421.
Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of females in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.
Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect and also the development of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.
Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: helpful tips to create and implementation. London: Wiley.
Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a little university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Communication sites plus the growth of romantic relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.
Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites therefore the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.
Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.
Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.
Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social support systems on intimate relationships: Through the lens for the social networking. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.
Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race mixture: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and types of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.
Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). When training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort marketing training. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets influencing attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.
Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not totally all love affairs are designed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in an area that is conflict-ridden. Center East Journal.